Next steps against the Family Immigration Rule changes.
- Campaigns
- Families
A comment on a previous blog on this website shows the level of support for the campaign against Theresa May's family immigration rule changes. Chris Bryant has received 500+ emails from people urging him to take a stand against the rule changes. That outstrips our expectations and gives us real hope that we can make a difference.
But 500 emails, while good, aren't going to make the difference on their own, so we say it's time to step up the pressure, and raise awareness wider still.
Take to the Tweets!
From tomorrow (Tuesday 19 June) until the day the rules are set to be introduced, we will be tweeting out a fact or a statement about the rule changes. the tweet will have a link to more info somewhere on this website. If you are not following @JCWInews on twitter, please do so, and retweet the daily tweet. We only have 1200 followers, but with our followers' followers, we have a huge reach!
Mobilise for Parliament!
We want as many people as possible to step up from emailing and being 'keyboard warriors' and come and see their MPs face-to-face. So, in conjuction with the Migrant Rights Network and others, we are organising a fun day out in the Houses of Parliament on the day, Monday 9 July, these iniquitous rule changes are implemented.
- At 4.30pm, there will be a protest (with media friendly street theatre) near Parliament
- After the protest there will be time to speak directly to your MP about the issue (you might even be able to persuade them to take you for a coffee in the splendid surroundings of the House's coffee rooms!). It's best to arrange to lobby your MP as far in advance as possible. There's a handy guide to lobbying at Parliament's very own website.
- In the early evening, at 6.30pm, Lord Judd will be hosting a meeting in the Grand Committee Room, in the Palace of Westminster where MPs, Lords, but most importantly the people effected by the rule changes will be invited to speak, to share their grievances and pool experiences.
If you are coming, please let us know through registering for free at eventbrite - it will help us ensure there's space for everyone.
Knowledge is Power!
We are currently busy working away at updating our dossier of case studies, adding in a load of analysis and interpretation of the rule changes and how they will play out in reality. There's hundreds of pages of stuff to work through, and guidance notes, yet to be published by UKBA. But we're sure to let you know when that's ready.
We're not going to stop hammering away at this, we hope you won't either.
Email Subscription
Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.
Browse by Category
Recently published
-
May 8th, 2013
-
May 7th, 2013
-
April 30th, 2013
-
April 21st, 2013
-
April 19th, 2013


Comments
I find it amazing that an arbitary amount has been chosen. No account has been made if you are self employed, living standerds which differ around the country, if you own your own home, and if you are already married. I married last November in South America, I have a home and a job, but according to the Home secretary I do not deserve and happiness of a married life. I have never claimed benefits and I was a fourth generation Conservative supporter. I have phoned Nick Cleggs office and recieved no direction on his voting intentions. Dominic Greens office also could not give any details of the proposal. However I was told by his office it will not be voted onas it is secondary legislation so I assume it is not important to them!
Suggestion; to also lobby not only our Parliamentary MP's but also our London Assembley reps' who constitionally represent Londoners
(and all their extended families); in addition, to lobby the EU Commissioner/ UNHCR special rep on humanitarian affairs and refugees too.
They voices could be very persuasive !
45% of all immigrants who come to England live in London. Do you honestly think the rest of England cares? Do you think the English want to have their ''idyllic villages'' over-run by African and Chinese settlers? As long as every town and village has one Chinese and one Indian take-away shop - that's fine, more than that is a problem. Australian, Kiwi even Italian immigrants are perfectly welcome in the glorious Great Britain. So called ''Eastern Europeans'' less, but they might still blend in because of the color of their skin. The British see the immigration as an invasion on their culture and traditional way of life, yet at the same time they like the advantages of having cheap nannys from former British colonies, pretty waitresses from Latvia and international restaurant scene. They also like to keep the benefits of visa free travel around Europe, buying properties in Spain etc., yet at the same time they complain of EU membership and would other migrants. They want economic and cultural advancement and benefits, yet at the same time their mentality and thinking is stacked in 70s
We don’t think the circumstances are quite as dire as that in the UK and this is shown in the level of response to the new laws by UK citizens who dared to fall in love with someone from outside of the EU.
The new rules will disadvantage UK citizens too as they will end up with fewer family reunification rights than EU citizens living in the UK. The new rules target families and we see children suffering the consequences as family unification is under threat.
I work for an organisation which frequently helps refugees with indefinite leave to remain in the UK to apply for their poses and/or families to join them in the UK. The changes proposed are totally arbitrary and mainly unreasonable. No sort of survey seems to have been undertaken.
I'm currently running a Facebook campaign against the proposed changes, and we have nearly 200 "likes" in the on eweek we've been set up. Please visit our page and "like" to help add your support. We're posting any updates from JCWI and other sources.
https://www.facebook.com/BritsAgainstFamilyExile
I suggest some of you folks need to understand whats behind the Coalition Govt proposals.
In their 2010 pre election manifesto the Tory Party pledged to reduce immigration into the UK.
The Govt cannot touch EU immigrants so this means they have to target NON EU immigrants.
That makes their policies dicriminatory and racist which is against UK and ECHR Law.
The reality is that the Coalition Govt is in fact not able to reduce immigration into the UK.
Therefore they are resorting to more radical methods. But they still cannot stop anyone with an EU passport. Thus the Coalition Govt is playing a numbers game that the judiciary has ruled in Court to be unlawfull. T May has been told by the Courts she is trying to side-step Parliamentary scrutiny which is unlawfull under the 1971 UK Immigration Act.
Thus a UK Minister of State is perpetrating unlawfull policies not only against NON EU nationals but in most cases British citizens who are the spouses of those NON EU nationals.
These are the Tory Nasty Party's first steps at curtailing the Rights of British Citizens to have a Family Life in the UK. Its the thin end of the wedge that in time could impact on freedoms of all Brits!
In 1930s Germany a ex Corporal demonised a race and instigated WW2 - look where that led!
If you are a British citizen and like me you have spent a lot of time working overseas,and in the course of time you met your wife, you then your returned to the UK to retire in your own home and with a guarranteed income not reliant on the state, but you cannot bring your wife with you because the UK Coalition Govt has implemented ridiculous pernicious regulations to stop your wife coming with you what would you all think?
I had more freedom in Arabia to have a family life with the wife I love than I do in the UK1
That says something fopr the type of Government running the UK today!
I am in a similar situation to you Jack being semi retired . I have bombarded my MP with emails setting out in great detail why current regulations such as the english test for entry , life in UK test after 2 years and the proposed new income threshhold are unfair ,cruel , heartless and inhumane in the way they penalise genuine and sincere self supporting couples who will make no demands for assistance from the state ( the strict rules to obtain a fiancee or spouse visa guarantee this ) . But the government Ministers responsible for the obnoxious one size fits all policies do not give a hoot about the misery, stress and unhappiness they cause their fellow UK citizens whose only SIN is to be married to a non EU citizen or be a fiancee of such a person . The Ministers sole aim is to reduce net immigration to tens of thousands under a broad brush fanatical policy with family immigration an easy target. These Ministers profess to have christian values of kindness, compassion and "do unto others as you would wish them to do unto you " but their harsh , cruel and grossly unfair policies do not observe these values . The language test and the nonsensical life in UK test should be abandoned ( enough strict criteria already , eg, showing relationship is genuine and sponsor has ample savings and/or income ,to ensure that visa applicants will place no burden on the state whatsoever ! ) A broadbrush approach should be abandoned and each visa aplication should be decided on it's merits . On TV programmes Ministers make untrue statements presumably to deceive the general public ( eg on Daily politics and on a recent question time ) and their UNTRUE statements were not challenged . Finally , Australia is a country of immigrants and allow immigrants to learn the english language after arriving as of course all people wish to do - no nonsense talked there about the immigrants not becoming good citizens or finishing up in ghettoes ( claims made by UK Ministers ! ) . Also , no life in Australia test to take after 2 years and kicked out of the country if immigrant fails it as is happening in the UK under this government !
I am currently in Thailand and have been living with my wife and son for over 4 years outside the UK. I have been planning for many months now to return to the UK this year with my family (I am British, my son and wife are not).
These changes have effectively stopped me from returning home.
In Thailand very few British people earn 18,600 (or 22k if one has children). I have tried to find figures from the UK regarding income levels for Thailand and noticed, that for UK student loan repayments, Thailand has a figure almost 10,000 lower per year. So, the UK does recognize country specific incomes and this is different to the visa law.
Because of this income figure, I cannot use my past/present employment to show that I am not a benefits abuser. But I have been working for decades.
Also, due to this, I will now have to leave my family in Thailand for a minimum of 6 months to come to the UK and work just to meet new requirements. This is next to impossible - I cannot afford to maintain 2 houses and expenses in 2 different countries at the same time. Also, my son is only 3 and needs two parents to be with him.
Also, with the current economic state - 22k in my opinion is too high.
I need your help and I want to have the UK hear my voice.
The UK visa law is destroying my family!
Please keep my name as anonymous - but for your records you can use my email.
Anonymous Brit expat in Thailand.
I have the deepest sympathy with your situation. My own wife is Thai and I have a teenage step son both of who I love deeply. My wife was with me in the UK and we got caught out in a similiar way to you. I am afraid this Coalition Govt is totally heartless.
They are operating a policy based on reducing net immigration to meet their pre 2010 election pledge to reduce numbers. Its a number game!
But independent charities have said the Coalition Govt policies on reducing net immigration is not achievable. Hence they are making Visas applications for NON EU nationals even more difficult to obtain. That is unless you are a Russian millionaire banker who seem to be able to get get a visa and buy expensive houses in London!
I am afraid that you will not be able to get your wife and son into the UK easily. It is a long tedious and expensive process designed to impede rather than assist.
Even in Thailand applying to the British embassy is a head banging process where I found I met with obstruction at every turn.
I am not trying to put you off. Just warning you based on my own experience and that of others.
There are NON EU people here married to Brits with young children like yourself who have bought a house in the UK to settle to lead a family life who now find they are to be seperated and will have to return to their own countries leaving their wife and children here! Sorry these are the facts!
I understand your comment about the £18,600 minimum and share it. But it is designed as one more wall for people like yourself, and me, to climb.
Then you have the pre-entry English language test and after that the Life in the UK test. If I tell you there are British nationals, including me, who have taken these sample tests and failed them. They are not designed to pass applicants but to faill them.
Each test you pay a fee so the UKBA / its contrators earn again and again! Its now considered a rip off!
When you enter this tread mill you probably think the British Govt wouldn't stoop to these levels. But they do.
Same as they have introduced all these new regulations since 2010. They have allowed certain press to print copy 'demonising' immigrants in order to turn the uninformed members of the public against immigrants.
This is the UK today and in the last two years it has worsened. I do not want you to have find out the hard wau at your expense Ok.
I wish you good luck I am sorry if it is bad news but I think it best if you know the facts, the truth, from an expat whoes been down this road!
Process of authoritarian convergence towards dystopia. George Orwell and other writers wrote of future with erosion of civil liberties. UK is starting to compete with certain Middle East dictatorships in curtailing rights of nationals to marry foreigners. Also banning things, internet censorship, more and more security guards (privatised muharabat), more fearful workforce, attacks on trade unions, micromanagement of education at whim of powerful individuals, flattering press corps etc. All of this was described in the 50s and 60s by writers such as George Orwell, Frederick Pohl, John Brunner etc.
twitter @d4maths
Before the general election every middle class Brit seemed to have been unhappy and unsatisfied with the policies on immigration as being to lenient and open to abuse etc...Unacceptable and unsustainable levels of immigration had been cited by then Opposition candidates and they have now been democratically elected by the British public and are fulfilling their Manifesto pledges on immigration. Now every one seem to complain about the new policy. Before the election, everyone moaned that migrants can't speak English and don't integrate. At the same time the everywhere in public service you go there are leaflets in 10 different languages ranging from how to buy Oyster Card to how to apply for public funds. I am currently preparing to take Life in the UK Test and must say it has been very useful to me. I have learned so many things I did not know and it is benefit to my life in the UK. Those who moan about Life in the UK test have no genuine intention to integrate. To learn English and about the country you intend to make your home is the bare minimum everyone should be able to do.
I worked in the middle east on the oil fields. I can vouch that I had more freedom to live a family life in Saudi than I now have in the UK under this Tory led Coalition.
Last night on BBC Parliament they broadcast the Commons debate on ECHR Article 8. It was a farce with the usual right wing Tories misrepresenting the facts as do the right wing Tory press. The labour MPs were lame ducks and the Lib Dems not even in the house.
The only MP to put up any truthful represenation was Pete Wishart SNP MP for Perth and N Pershire. He spoke the truth the rabble rousing Tory right wing were using extreme misuse of Article 8 to mask the introduction of exteme measures to hit the family lives of ordinary Brits.
As an Englishman I am ashamed of English MPs.
I think only one Labour Mp Jeremy Corbin spoke out about the rights of children and partners that were being trashed by the Tory nasty party policies. Bill Cash Tory MP noted the absence and silence of the Lib Dems in the House.
I am now an SNP supporter I hope they get independence and I intend to seek political asylum with the estimated 15,000 families also affected by Cameron May and Greens policies supported by the Tory Nast Partyracist right wing MPs that were all seen on BBC Parliament last night!
Marion, you seem to take your view of what "every middle class Brit" thinks or says from certain parts of the media. it certainly isn't our experience. And unfortunately when you claim "Now every one seem to complain about the new policy." this is simply not the case.
Of course some Brits think what you describe and others don't. Generalisations such as the ones you make are rarely helpful. There is a more scientific and informed breakdown of people's attitudes to immigrants and immigration in the British Future report here: http://www.britishfuture.org/publication/hopes-and-fears-the-british-fut...
No one argues not learning English is the best way forward for anyone living in the UK, we simply say learning the language is better in the UK, and is helpfully to the UK's economy, rather than to demand English capability before entry.
We are glad you enjoyed learning for the Life in the UK test, but we also understand that many people born and bred in the UK would struggle to pass that test, but it does not seem to hamper people's existence in this country.
Marion I am a born and bred British national and I have the right to complain. I own my own home and have adequate income pay my taxes and lead a respectable life.
The Australians have a system whereby the let immigrants in and then they can learn in country,
That was what Matrix recommended to Liberty in Sept 2010. Liberty asked the Coalition Govt for consultation which was ignored.
Instead the Govt rushed in its pre entry English test.
I know competent British nationals who have taken the test and failed. Have you taken that test? Give us the benefit of your experience please!
My wife was in the UK for 27 months. She has a BA in Business studies and studied English.
My neighbour is a retired Deputy Head teacher who knows my wife and they swop emails.
I know a retired Judge who knows my wife and used to talk to her regularly.
We have a joint bank account and my wife still uses two UK credit cards. The shops I go into they all klnow my wife and ask after her. People on the bus ask after her!
Every middle class Brit was stirred up by certian popular press that went out of their way to demonise immigrants regardless of the individual situation. That still prevails.
Read the broadsheets! See the green and red arrows by the 'sheeples' and trolls who have been influenced.
Do you know about the BNP and the EDL who use those sites?
You cannot go on one press site and state the facts about the Human Rights Act and Family life without getting 100s of red arrows. Which that paper is notoriuos for inciting resentment
and demonising immigrants!
Your life in the UK studies are teaching you what this right wing Govt want you to learn.
That is far removed from the real Britain that I knew and grew up with wher justice tolerance ethics and morality formed part of the Englisg British way of Life and which you appear not to being taught at your Life in the UK classes!
I am an English woman, I have been with my Tunisan husband for 3 years, but only married for 1 year. I work 45 hours a week, but only recieve minimum wage, I work from 5:30am till 2:30pm.Then I go home and take care of my sons, I cannot work no more hours as my 2 sons are disabled (not my husbands) my sons love my husband dearly and when we visit they cannot understand why their step-father cannot come with us and I have to comfort them and to seeing them this way is killing me. There is no way I can earn the money they are asking us spouses to earn, there is not enough hours in the day, my sons need 24 hour care. My husband was refused entry to the UK, and we have our appeal on the 23rd of july if he is refused again, I dunno what I will do. We have used our savings to pay for a solicitor and other things related to our case. I live in a council house, just an ordinary worker. I know this is going to sound crazy, but I have always worked, sometimes 3 jobs at a time to make ends meet, thats the way I was raised, you work for what you need. All this and I find out that a man whose wife claims every benefit (and there is no reason she cannot work) has got his clearance no refusal, no questions asked. No I'm not jealous I'm angry that I work hard, pay my taxes and still my husband gets refused. I'm not arguing that there is genuine people out there that cannot work, due to circumstances beyond their control. But is it right that we pay taxes and again the working class come last again ? My husband also has a job if and when he comes to the UK but its not looking good is it due to this stupid, inhumane law. I do agree that we should be able to support our spouses and yes in some circumstances claim some sort of benefits, but not allow a foreign spouse to come here and their spouse not be able to support themselves just because your too lazy to get a job. I get DLA for my 2 sons and I'm £140 worse off because I work, maybe I should claim all the benefits like income support and carers allowance and pay no taxes or rent or council tax like this woman. What does Theresa May want me to do uproot my 2 sons, who need specialist care constantly ? They don't have the care the boys need in Tunisia, it would be like sending them to their death. I am disgusted at this governments racist ways. They are no better than the BNP.
annette
Very sorry to hear your story and your obvious concern because of your difficult situation.
It was Pete Wishart SNP and Jeremy Corbin Labour who were pleading the cases of people like your good self and your sons in the Commons debate on Human Rights Article 8.
Regretably the Tory like MPs Dominic Rabb and Priti Patel didn't want to consider such cases.
Instead they concentrated their arguments on the criminals who have used Aricle 8 to gain Right to a Family Life in the UK because that has more impact with the general public.
In effect the Tory MPs were incorrectly distorting the argument to demonise all NON EU immigrants and make entry to the UK as difficult as possible.
This is all being done so in the 2015 general election the Tory Party can claim to the electorate they have tackled the UK immigration problem!
That doesn't help your case and is regetably no comfort to you. Let us hope your appeal is successful because you have a just cause.
For some comfort one Tory MP a Barrister stated he did not think the new regulations would make any difference to the way the Judiciary will rule.
Let us hope that is the case with you and your family. Thank you for sharing your story you should be heard.
I think the general public would be appalled at what your situation is I know I am. Good luck and best wishes.
@Admin - thanks for your comments. I am taking my view not from certain parts of media (if you mean Daily Mail) but from the streets I walk, the places I work, the people I speak to and yes, the mainstream media I watch and read.
I am the only non-english native speaking employee working in a company with about 5 white English workers. They all seem to have the view that there are too many foreigners (read non-white and eastern europeans) in England and they they get preferential treatment when it comes to benefits and housing. Furthermore, it seemed to be the wish of many commentators and attendees of political discussions on TV and Radio that there should be a referendum on UK's membership in EU - the view seem to be that withdrawal from EU is desirable in future. Walking the streets of London, again, talking to people there appears to be frustration with immigration. I am afraid JCWI's views represent very tiny % of what UK population thinks - I believe around 5%. (not to say that I disagree - you are doing a good job in what you do)
I also do not agree with the Conservative policy on immigration, however, particularly on students. Their policy is already doing harm to UK's reputation as the top place in the world to come to study English. Also, the termination of PSW is directing potential students elsewhere to CA, AU and US. Everybody losses out - businesses, colleges, landlords, shops, restaurants, taxi drivers etc.
@Geronimo - Life in the UK test - yes I must admit there are questions in there that even native average-educated, born in Britain person would not know. Such questions amount to about 15% of all the test questions. I am yet to take the test next week. (I will let you know whether the result) The problem is - people in this country (native and migrants) have become to comfortable and too depending on the State (the State has to tell you to eat 5 veg/fruit a day or you will get sick!!!) An American/South American or east Asian model where people are more responsible for their own lives is needed here. The problem with people who come with valid visa and overstay would be solved if Brazilian or Thai model could be applied, by imposing a fine for every day person over-stays their visa - of course before that exit control would need to be re-introduced. Also, more objectivity in media and among the natives is needed. Everybody points fingers at ''east europeans'' but what about the thousands of Spanish youths, Greeks, Portuguese and impoverished Italians who come here for work? The thousands of Australians and New Zealanders who come every year on 2 year work visa and never leave because they realise their grand-father was born here, so that they can stay on Ancestry visa for another 5 years?
Marion
let me reply to your first comment' every person in the street! Do you know where they get their prejudices - from the polular press!
By printing reports that demonise immigrants they appeal to the built in racism in the British psyche and that sells news papers.
Note the circulations of the Mail compared to the Guardian then compare their reporting. Its giving the 'sheeples' what they want to read.
Second point if the Govt can demonise a certain group of people it takes public attention away from the reality of the Govts own incompetance!
In 1930 Germany a certain little ex Corporal played that game diverted negative attention to the Jews which led to the concentration camps!
Next I don't think the average Brit knows the difference between the European Union and the European Convention on Human Rights.
Its all non UK / Brit and alien to Mr Average.
When you try to tell them that the ECHR was the idea of a Brit - Sir David Maxwell-Fyffe ( a Nuremberg prosecutor) and supported by that arch Conservative Sir Winston Churchill after WW2 and was seen as a bulwark against Stalinist European expansion the average Brit goes deaf blind and dumb. They don't realise the hard won freedoms from WW2 have give them the life they have in the UK today!
I do because I remember German bombers over London Coventry Liverpool etc and then the V1 and V2 rockets flattening streets of houses!
Yes I.m that old and I have studied life in Britain at the sharp end when we had food ration books and no bananas and pineapples etc etc etc.
Then these sheeples and trolls don't seem to understand that 40% of UK trade is with Europe. So the other 60% has to be with the rest of the world. They fail to understand Britain now has very limited natural resources - oil gas coal.
The UK relies on imports and needs to export to pay for those imports. I know UK imports of oil and gas could be turned off just like turning off the tap at the kitchen sink! So just what can Britain export and to who?
The UK relies on those foreign lands and peoples for its survival and the average Brit doesn't realise how easy the UK can be compromised!
I do because I worked in the Middle east oil industry with nationals from US Europe Middle East and Asia.
So when the Tory nasty party developes and implements anti immigration racist policies just to get votes from a people they keep ignorant of the facts they are saying to the rest of the world 'we don't want you'. That in turn will breed resentment and those other races will say ' but your PM preaches democracy to us - but he doesn't practise it!
In fact he is preachingdemocracy but sending us his hypocracy and in return we will send you back our hypocracy! So Britain in effect destroys itself!
''That in turn will breed resentment and those other races will say ' but your PM preaches democracy to us - but he doesn't practise it!
In fact he is preaching democracy but sending us his hypocracy and in return we will send you back our hypocracy! So Britain in effect destroys itself!''
@Geronimo - I agree with you on the above.
im in japan at the moment, with my fiance, our first child will be born at the start of september, out intention was to return to the UK in january, I co-run a small business in Bristol, i feel confident we could make a good life there without accessing public funds - as an aside, accessing public funds is a nightmare, the times in my life where I have qualified to claim dole or something I've always been put of by the misinformation and soul crushing bureaucracy of it and just work for a catering agency or something - i really believe there should be a welfare state, I'm sure it gets abused by some people, as clearly some people will abuse any system, its fine for me in my mid twenty's to just work some low wage job instead of claiming something from the state, but you feel like you have some kind of an agreement with 'it' - i guess thats just not true.
why cant we come to the UK and just not be allowed to access public funds. it seems that, for better or worse, I can live and work in japan as a spouse - Im pretty sure that i just wouldn't be given any public funds if i asked - though my japanese is so poor that I'd probably in fact asked for public fudge. I guess that the answer is that this is a numbers game 'we reduced immigration by x. goodness me I hate this government, what have any lib dems said about this issue? and labour?
I've written to my PM (stephen williams, LD) but have heard nothing back, i wrote to labours chris something, his reply was fine but doesn't feel like labour are putting up much of show about this - it all seems to be getting wrapped up with criminals having cats and stupid Teresa may nonsense talk.
is it in any way good that the courts still have the right to say whats in the best interests of the child? if I've even understood that thing i read in the guardian.
sorry, this is a rambling mess of thoughts and one stupid joke about fudge
is there something more i can be doing from here?
why are more people not concerned about a member of the cabinet saying that human right is not an absolute right. nuts to that.
aaron
aaron
you are not rambling. you are expressing yourself.your love for your family, your ambition for them, your frustration resentment and anger that you feel about the situation that now prevails under this Tory led Coalition Govt. You are like the rest of us bewildered outraged and asking why?
You are a young man. I am an old man.Marion and annette have expressed themselves and rightly so. This is all we can do is tell the world what the new Tory led Coalition that claims to be democratic is doing. Shame the British Govt reveal the truth to the world we can do no more!
But we need to know our enemy. What they are doing and why! That they do this because they have allowed, even encouraged blatant racism to permeate UK politics which they have exploited for votes by claiming they are addressing the UK peoples fears about immigration!
This is the Tory led Coalition Govt policy which Cameron May Green and right wing MPs are exploiting to try and make a name for themselves and get votes at the 2015 election. A distorted and shameful policy done for the basest of reasons!
They tolerate the popular press to daily incite racist reports and then allow the public to support those views and drown out other opinion.
I have sent evidence of this to the Leveson Inquiry where it was reported that May was introducing her new regulations. How that has been reported and how she attacked immigrants and is trying to manipulate the Judiciary into bending to her policy. We have to fight them any way we can and tell the world the truth as to what is happening today in the UK.The oxygen of publicity has to be our weapon!
Last night on BBC Newsnight they featured Damian Green and Professor Acton of the University of East Anglia. The subject was the inclusion of students in the immigration figures. Prof Acton wants then taken out because they are impeding foreign students studying in the UK.
He says foreign sydents are getting the idea they are not wanted in the Uk. He says they are fee paying and in fact they contribute greatly to the UK economy. For every ten students there are 6 jobs for British nationals.
I saw a House of Lords debate it is estimated that by 2015 the UK could lose £25Bn in foreign student fees!
In the same debate Lord Derry Irvine stood up and stated Freedoms in the UK are being TRASHED! No one opposed him not even Lord Tom NcNally the Coalition Govt Minister for Justice!
Last night Damian Green was unmoved from the Govt position. But D Green is a Minister with a checkered past. As a back bencher he got himself arrested in the House of Commons for encouraging a Govt employee to pass him classified information. He was taken to the police Station and told he could make the standard phone call. The person he phoned was Andy Coulson who is now under arrest for phone hacking!
The damage this Tory policy is causing to ordinary UK citizens is immense. You folks have all been brave enough to add your experience as evidence. You have done a good job by adding your evidence to this Govts wrongs being perpetrated against good British nationals!
Some of you have tried the legal route and it has cost a fortune people spending your life savings. That is wrong.There was an organisation named the Immigration Advisory Service to help people. The Govt stopped that by closing the IAS down on administration grounds!
Its important that we know our enemy. The policies, the reasons, the methodology and then we are not blind and wonder why! We know the facts we can adjust and we can respond in our own manner. We can go out and tell the world our story like we do here and it can work.
I watched a BBC program Question Time with an audience in the NE England. The matter of splitting UK families was brought up and members of the audience were appalled and said the Govt was wrong. I suggest we get our stories out as much as we can and shame this Tory Govt with the truth. Our publicity can be powerful lets use it. best wishes to you all.
Admin,
I will study your comments more later but are you really saying it is fair and humane to kick a man or woman's NON EU wife or Husband out of the UK SOLELY because they happen to fail the "life in UK test" which I and many other UK born people would struggle to pass especially if they have a bad memory as I do at my age ?? They do this even if the couple are fully self supporting and will never make a claim for benefits etc . I do hope I misunderstood you and you agree that this harsh and cruel regulation plus others such as INCOME limit of £18500 of the government are designed with one purpose in mind , namely to reduce net immigration to tens of thousands , in order to curry favour with the electorate and hence help their re-election prospects . They do not give a hoot about the pain and suffering their policies cause to their fellow British citizens in their relentless and fanatical pursuit of their aim. They profess to have christian beliefs of compassion , family life and kindness and even in human rights but deny a family life ( which they have) to other UK citizens and their non EU partners .. It is quite incredible that they can behave in this way in the 21st century and , as a University lecturer commented on TV last night in connection with student visas , they have almost stalinist policies . This also applies to their policies on family immigration too it seems ! Theresa May makes the rather obvious statement that a UK citizen can marry who he or she wishes to marry . Of course they can and she can nothing about that . But by introducing very difficult or virtually insurmountable obstacles to overcome under her unfair and cruel regulations she is effectively preventing the couple living together in the UK citizen's own country ..Her and her Ministers should look into their heart and soul and have a big re-think on their cruel policies and realise that some things are more important than re-election .
@Peter No, on any reading of the previous admin comment there is no way we have suggested kicking someone out for failing the test. We are actively campaigning against the income thresholds and have never been in support of the test in any way, shape or form. I think you shoud re-read the comment - we are opposed to 'kicking people out'.
@Marion Rather than give impressions of what we'd imagine teh population of the UK thinks, as you have, we linked to a survey operated by Ipsos MORI on behalf of British Future. Whilst fallible, this survey holds a lot more weight than impresionistic views of whats going on.
Look at the results. Page 22 just under a third of people said that immigration is amongst the top three reasons for youth unemployment - less than 'the global Economy', 'Businesses not providing apprenticeships' and 'the current government'.
On page 27 it says 55% think that "Immigration to Britain will damage economic recoveryt by taking away jobs from people already here" whilst 24% think that "Immigrants skills and labour are necessary to help Britain's economic recovery".
That's the economic arguments, but where do you think people get the idea that immigrants get preferential treatment over benefits and housing? Not the media and ministers such as Damian Green who lied about migrants' benefits claims the other day? Because immigrants do NOT get preferential treatment when it comes to housing and benefits.
Peter makes the comment that some things are more important than re-election. Which of course is completely true. It is to a normal citizen.
But these are politicians and most of them are not normal. They are consumed by their ownself importance arrogance and ambitions that they have no consideration for the normal citizens of their country. The politicians purpose is to dominate and control and that is blatantly obvious with Cameron May and Green and the Tory party right wing aparatchnics.
See them in the Commons debate on Article 8 of the ECHR they concentrated solely on the criminals who have used it to stay in the UK.
When the matter of others, like us British nationals with NON EU spouses, was raised by Jeremy Corbin and Pete Wishart they would not listem.
Instead they scoffed and smeared and degraded making smart ass comments that because Article 8 had been used by lawyers getting public funds like Abu Qatada every other case was the same.
Abu Qatada's case has cost nearly £1M in public funds! Because he has been well represented by lawyers earning eye watering fees that the rest of us cannot afford or have no access to that the legal profession has benefited from! Its been a nice little earner for the legal industry!
Who among us can afford the £100 plus for a solicitor or the £200 plus for a barrister which the lawyers for Abu Qatada have been getting on both sides to reach the sum of nearly £1M !
When I approached my MP he suggested I take my case to Court. He knew I could not afford that amount of money. When I asked him what about my rights as a British citizen inder UK Law and ECHR Article 8 he said ' I don't know I am not a lawyer'!
But he sits right next to an MP in the Commons who is an eminent lawyer. Now he's been awarded a Knigthood for his services as a back bencher and not rocking the Govt boat!
Ordinary people have been sucked into this and the fees charge by the UKBA / Home Office are exorbitant. They are deliberately made high in order to prevent NON EU nationals joining their British spouses! Its a put up job worthy of any con artist extracting money from good British citizens!
But there is bad feeling in the Home Office, the UKBA, the police against T May and Green.
May sacrificed Brody Clark and thats upset the rank and file. Then the cuts at the UKBA and the police. The police conference where May was told to her face the Police did not trust her!
So beware the Ides of March because the truth will out as it did when Green was arrested in the Commons. Yet May made him Immigration Minister!
Cameron made Andy Coulson his Head of Communications despite ample warnings from prominent straighter politicians not to!
The old saying be careful whose fingers you tread on going up the ladder because when you come down they may stamp on yours!
We could get justice yet good friends so hang on in there. Remember you all have decency and right on your side!
Does anyone honestly believes that 18.5K a year is a wage that is too high in UK? I can not speak for outside London situation, but earning 18K in London is just about good for the bare survival. Anyone earning below 18.5K and living in London is almost certainly to be dependent on public funds. (different story when spouse comes and starts earning her/his bit)
I earn £18,260 per annum in London and do not claim any benefits. I know many people in London earning similar or less and still not claiming.
marion,
It depends on many factors such as lifestyle , whether the sponsor has savings etc etc and an arbitary ceiling of £18500 is wrong and not fair . I myself have a lot of savings but interest rates are abysmal and my income is less than £18500 but there is no way my non EU partner or I would ever need or be ENTITLED to make a claim for benefits under UK benefit rules . But even so my partner would not get a visa if she eventually passes the english test if the new income limit is introduced . It is just another unnecessary obstacle designed to reduce net immigration . Please read my previous posting about the current rules which make it impossible to get a visa if applicant can not PROVE CONCLUSIVELY that no claim for benefits would be made in the future - hence NO NEED for any income limit as each case IS JUDGED ON IT'S MERITS at present and income and assets are looked at closely by UKBA, along with other criteria, before a visa is granted !
Marion
I suggest it depends as much on your situation, committments and lifestyle as well as where you live. If you live outside London have no rent to pay lead a steady but comfortable and sustainable lifestyle - no wild parties, boozy weekends or backing the wrong horses the £18,600 or even less can be perfectly adequate. The figure of £18,600 was one the MAC arrived at. Aparently they recommended £25,600 but I read the Lib Dems challenged that amount. So May settled at £18,600 plus £2,500 for each child!
May says MAC is responsible for £18.600 amount so she can try to escape her responsibility that the decision to implement it is HER'S alone!
An interesting report by the Mail on 3 June 2012 headlined '£900 visa row could destroy Earl's marriage'!
The Mail reported that the Earl of Cardigan claimed his second marriage to his American wife will collapse because he cannot afford her £900 visa fee.
The Earls £25Million country estate is administered by two trustees who the Earl claims refused to give him the £900 for his American wife's UK visa!
This report was only published in the Mail on the 3 June 2012 then it was withdrawn. But not before I made a hard copy.
You see folks you can live on a £25M estate and still not be able to afford a visa for you wife!
Interesting the report only made the Mail on one day.
Mrs Chapti the Indian lady in Leicester her case went on in the Mail for ages.
The Mail even going to interview her husband on his Indian farm!
You don't think its a case of one law for them and another for us?
Any more Earls among our readers!
Is Theresa having a joke...she states that her aims are to prevent people from coming to UK and becoming a burden on the state.
This can be so easily be achieved by just having a rule that no foreign spouse can have access to any welfare benefits until they have paid their taxes for say 5 years. And that the sponsor is not on any benefits when he applies for his/her spouse visa.
She is targeting the poor families who are earning a modest living and are not on benefits. The rich will have no problems as they can show in the region of £67K (if both partners are not working) in order to get a visa.
These proposals are a direct attack on the poor families and will cause many families to be separated, many children to be brought up by single parents and many parents will be prevented from living with their children in this country.
Really is this what our ancestors fought and died for against the Nazis and alike so that we can have freedom from discrimination of any type. Many may think that these are sensible provisions, until they are in a situation where they need their family members from abroad to come and live with them.
We should be ashamed of this government and the fact that someone will be able to appeal these provisions to the highest court is ludicrous as it would be very expensive (something even the rich would avoid from doing).
This is another step towards taking 'Great' away from 'Great Britain'. Theresa has taken the easiest and most devastating step to tackle a problem which can only be tackled by concentrating on EU migration. there are so many other simple and less discriminative routes which can be taken to ensure that foreign spous do not become a burden on our state.
Adam
What May says and does is two different things. She says that to fool the general public that she is doing it for public interests.
She really wants to keep net immigration numbers down to meet the 2010 Tory Party pre elction pledge on immigration.
But she cannot keep out EU nationals. So she targets NON EU nationals.
May will not admit she's targetting NON EU nationals because that is discriminatory and racist and therefore in breach of the ECHR and UK Law!
Thus in the Commons debate on Article 8 on 19 June 2012 the Tory arguments were all around the criminals who had used Article 8 to stay in the UK. The Tory MP supporters all quoted these criminals who had been allowed to stay under Article 8 the Right to a Family Life.
Only two MPs Pete Wishart SNP and Jeremy Corbin Labour raised the matter of bonafide Britsh nationals being denied their Right to a Family Life under Article 8 if the new regulations May wanted introduced were brought in. The affect on partners and children!
Those two MPs speaking for us respectable ordinary British citizens who want the Right to a Family Life upheld were drowned out.
This has been May's methodology since Nov 2010 when the pre entry English tests were first introduced.
Since then all the tests have been made more difficult with one objective that is to stop applicants passing those tests and to be able to refuse them a UK visa! To keep immigration numbers down!
May and the tory's only have one objective which is to be able to say to the British public in 2015 they kept their Tory 2010 pledge and reduced immigration! Its political manipulation devoid of any consideration for the British nationals with NON EU spouses.
The Right to have a Family Life in the UK, the right and freedom to chose your own partner, has been taken away by a self interested UK Tory Political Party set on getting votes in the 2015 elections.
Demonising immigrants also takes the publics attention away from the rest of the Tory policies which are hitting the old, the disabled the children and the low paid.
It isn't until the press publish a situation whereby public opinion is roused that politicians act - as we see now with the tax avoidance news!
The NON EU spouses of British nationals are easy targets. Small in numbers but never the less number to be hit to reduce net UK immigration!
hi Adam,
you make very good points . The policy prior to the new english test and life in UK test was such that an applicant would not be granted a fiancee or spouse visa if she or he could not show evidence to prove that her or his sponsor ( partner) had sufficient income and/or assets and no claim for benefits would be made in the future . So absolutely no need for any new measures to be introduced . The new measures( obstacles) are being brought in to reduce net immigration as has been mentioned on this board as the government know that the obstaceles are insurmountable in some cases .
Admin,
I do apologise for reading your post too quickly and misunderstanding what you said . It was silly of me and borne out of my frustration at the false statements made by Government Ministers to misslead the general public on immigration matters. Seems that any tactics are acceptable for them in their mission to reduce net immigration !
I received a reply from Chris Bryant, and he had already picked up on the fact that the proposals as they stand will discriminate against certain groups such as the disabled and women, who historically have been on lower pay than men. I also flagged up to him that sponsors on a pension will likewise be discriminated against, as they too are less likely to reach such an income requirement (which incidentally seems totally arbitrary). His thinking is that the Labour Party may suggest a 'bond' deposit as an alternative to a minimum income requirement. Chris Bryant may also decide to support proposals to combat sham marriages.
I wrote to Dave Cameron (after all, why not go to the top!) to suggest to him that Theresa May's proposals to curb family migration are anti-family, counter-productive, and unfair. I've also pointed out to him that the Conservative Party is becoming associated with a pogrom (the organised persecution of a small minority) and that objectors will make political capital out of that. For good measure, I also reminded him what Louise Christian (human rights lawyer) said about the proposals: that in times of austerity, governments try to court popularity by playing to a popular prejudice, in this case immigration. The P.M. will soon be wishing he'd never started on this!
Good news folks. The Independent has a report that Baroness Warsi has attacked the 'racist' curbs on immigration.
The Independent reports the row exploded when T May proposed that UK citizens should not be allowed to bring a foreign wife or husband into the UK unless they earned £40,000 a year!
Appaently Baroness Warsi exploded and won the backing of Nick Glegg and Ms May was forced to lower the income threshold to £18.600.
I think is interesting is Baroness Warsi's comment that Ms May's policy is racist!
We have known this all the time and now the Tory Party's own Co-Chairman Baroness Warsi has confirmed it!
The Independent reports Cabinet colleagues say she ( Warsi) bluntly warned that such a policy would be viewed as racist!
It is a breakthro that a senior Tory Minister ( Warsi) is accusing another Tory Minister (May) of implementing a racist policy against immigrants!
John F
Its good to write to the PM but unless your one of his constituents your unlikely to get a reply. Some of us have written to numerous Ministers and MPs without success.
As for wishing he'd never started it well he probably feels the same about many matters not least the Leveson Inquiry and hiring Coulson.
But this immigration was situation started in 2010 when Cameron and the Tory Party pledged to reduce UK immigration which the IPPR says they will not achieve by 2015!
It seems we may have another breakthro in understanding. Both the Mail and the guardian report that Ed Miliband has said that under Labour too many East Europeans immigrants were let into the UK to work. He admits that has incensed the British public who to them see all immigrants as taking their jobs etc.
To the general public an immigrant is just that. To there is no distinction or the fact that many immigrants do not take British jobs or get benefits and this idea has been wrongly fostered by many right wing popular press that all immigrants are bad!
The Tory Govt have used this fear to promote their draconian blanket negative discrimnatory and racist policies against the NON EU immigrants. Reason they cannot do anything about EU immigrants. So they have targeted only NON EU and introduced their new regualtions.
Ed Miliband has said Labour will introduce a new immigration policy which is best laid out in the Guardian newspaper. It could mean a new policy for non EUs as well which in turn could ease the pressure on our spouses and offer us hope for the future.
For me it is the first ray of hope of change.
The Tory Govt with May have pursued a draconian punishing unjust and unnecessary policy.
A policy which the Tory Party's own Co- Chairman has now admitted is racist! It is of cours discriminatory and is therefore in breach of UK Law.
This was the advice to Liberty that Matrix Rabhinder Singh QC and Aileen McColgan gave in Sept 2010 in the matter of pre Entry English tests.
Tests which are being made more difficult by the Tory Govt and are coming into disrepute but which can now be seen as equally racist. Because they only apply to NON EU! They could now be equally condemned by the Judiciary in the same manner Warsi has made herself heard that the Tory policy is indeed racist!
Racism and discrimination are unlawfill under UK and the ECHR Law. So Article 8 could well make a rebound for good British nationals who just want their right and freedom to have their family life restored!
I suggest this is bad news for Cameron and Co and shows their unthought out knee jerk policies so viciously implemented by May and Green.
yes, but the UK Border is still a joke. I went through Heathrow T1 last month on way back from Vienna. I am EU national with Permanent Residence Card issued by HO. It states on first page: You are advised to produce this document every time you cross UK Border.
So I produced this together with my passport to the Border official. He looked at it and barked back that what is it and that I don't need this. I looked at his badge and it read: substitute for UKBA staff, which means he was just some civil servant from another department protecting UK border on that day. His lack of knowledge gives you general idea how new arrivals are checked when crossing UK border. (E-borders is a mess, delayed and not functional and people who are barred from coming to UK, can still come) IRIS system supposed to save cost and staff but someone still has to stand there and watch those people passing through. I witnessed peoples frustration on another arrival as the queue for IRIS was longer than the EU and queue.
The new policy on spouse visa is GREAT (only if you are rich, racist or prejudiced against the poor). It is simple if u have enough money you can be with your family members who are living abroad, but if you are poor you can not.
Hence a simple matter of money BUYING YOU RIGHTS.
Ohhhh what a wonderful place this country is becoming. tax reliefs for the rich, tax increase for low income families, politicians preaching on having a both parent family whilst they restrict families from being together, job cuts, cuts on spending, country diving back in recession, and so much still in the pipe line.
Marion
a good example and you are right to bring it out on this site. We know the UKBA is a mess. The Home Affairs Select Committee investigated and concluded the UKBA IS 'NOT FIT FOR PURPOSE. When john Reid was Home Sec he said the same.
The Chief Insp of the UKBA John Vine has done numerous report highliigthing the UKBA failings but they haven't improved. I have an arch lever file full of hard copy prints of press reports on UKBA incompetence just like you have stated.
The UKBA has always been a mess even when Phil Woolas was Immigration Minister.
In 2010 when May and Green took over instead of dealing with that UKBA mess they embarked on their pernicious policy against NON EU nationals.
Had May and Green cleaned up the mess left by Labour and then implemented a sensible immigration policy the mess would not have grown to the size it is today! The UKBA official you encountered obviously didn't know his job. None of them are 'user friendly'You should sees how the ECOs behave in British Embassy's.
The responsibility lays right at the top with May and Green. They are both incompetent politicians detested in the Home Office the UKBA and the Police! Who appointed them? The same person who appointed Coulson and sent LOL texts to Rebekah - thats right PM D Cameron!
Adam,
Yes, it is disgusting as it is discriminates in favour of better off or wealthy people . There was no need whatsoever to change the rules and regulations which existed before 29th October 2010 ( new english language test ) as they were onerous enough and ensured that visa was only granted by the UKBA if applicant proved her or his sponsor had adequate means and would not therefore claim any benefits . Seems from a post above that Baroness Wasi is sympathetic to our cause . does anyone on this board have access to her as she could be directed to this site or MRN site and read some of the posts ?? she would quickly see the level of discrimination displayed by Mr Cameron and his Ministers . and just might be willing to raise it in the Lords !
Peter
I suggest Baroness Warsi is more concerned about her reputation among the constitents with ethnic backgounds the same as her own than she is about 'our cause'.
She knows very well how they are reacting to the new May proposals which is why she was motivated to challenged May like she did.
Likewise with Nick Glegg he will know the reactions of constitents in towns with large ethnic backgrounds and cultures whose populations will be up in arms about May and her minimum income levels. Politicians are only aware of what votes they can attract.
This is why Ed Mililband and Labour are now looking at a new policy on immigration! Miliband wants the votes that Cameron is losing!
Had Cameron appointed a Home Secretary and Immigration Minister who knew more about the subject and had more experience then they would, and should, have addressed the real problem which isn't NON EU spouses but unchecked east European immigrants.
There is no doubt that British employers find certain European workers better employees. They have a reputation for being more skilled and diligent.
Whereas in contrast the UK has a mass of serial unemployed which in cases goes from generation to generation who do not have basic education skills for employment needed in todays world.
However this does not excuse the blanket Tory policy of hitting all NON EU spouses when many of them do not wish to work in the first instance.
In my wife's 27 month visa it stated she could work in the UK. She never wanted to and never intended to because my income is such she did not have to. She was totally supported on my income which is above that now being implemented.
All the Home Office / UKBA had to do was stamp in her passport 'not allowed to work in the UK'.
My wife did not come to the UK to work but to be with me so we could lead a normal family life togther as the law under Article 8 of the ECHR part of UK Law!
But May and Green's knowledge of the immigration situation is such they failed to realise what simple checks they could have implemented.
Instead they embarked on their current policies which are not and will not reduce immigration by 2015 allowing them to honor their 2010 pledge!
Now Cameron has in his Govt one Senior Minister stating another Senior Minister is implementing racist measures which are against UK Law!
I too am utterly devastated at these proposals it means there is no chance of me having my Albanian spouse with me . I too work full time but do not earn this limit . A solicitor has advised me to submit the visa before the July 9th deadline without his English test results now I don't know what to do risk it and lose nearly all my savings he is not confident of passing anyway it is the ielts exam which is known to be difficult. What hope do we have I want my husband here now not 3 years later not to claim benefit but to work hard and pay our taxes .
Natalie
don't despair we don't know yet whats going to happen. We didn't think the Warsi situation would come about or that Ed Milliband would say Labour would introduce a new immigration policy.
These will have thrown a bit of a spanner in Camerons works. He could decide May and Green have to change policy or even better go!
A new Home Sec could have different ideas especially if there is now interest and possible challenges by Labour.
Cameron and the Tory Party will have an eye on the votes they can lose because of Mays ineffective and obnoxious immigration policy.
Some Tory backbenchers may rock the boat and Cameron himself could be challenged. The Lib Dems are in a lose lose situation.
Remember the Coalition is not an elected Govt. It was cobbled together because no party got a majority. Its not only failing because of its immingration policy but its economic policy and inability to get Brits back to work! Its a very unpopular Govt.
Glegg looked at the Tory party and Labour when forming the Coalition. He wanted Brown to go and Brown would not so he turned to Cameron.
Glegg could yet decide to pull out of the Coalition with Cameron and chuck his hand in with Miliband thus changing the whole situation!
Hang on in there steady as she goes thro rough waters there just might be a promised land on the horizon!
Natalie
you posed the question about the cost of an application visa, the chances of your husband's test result and your savings?
I refer you to a report dated 4th June 2011 by the UKBA Independent Chief Insp John Vine who stated - ' the Borders Agency puts profits before security'.
John Vine said ' the perception among staff was that the agency's emphasis was always on income generating work came first'.
With the information you provide if you were my sister or daughter I would strongly advise you 'hang onto your savings and wait for developemnets'. Its what I am doing. I hope it helps. But its your decision.
It is quite ironic that David Cameron and his Ministers will not attend the European championships in Ukraine because of that country's HUMAN RIGHTS record with regard to the imprisoned Yulia Timoshenko but happily deprive Uk citizens , some of whom post on this site , of their human rights to a family life with the partner of their choice who just happens to be a NON EU citizen and who will be a Ukrainian citizen in some cases !
Truth is this won't effect immigration that much, since you have the whole of the EU that can just stroll into the country bypassing any of theses laws. Top to it off this will just end up tearing family's apart and increasing the amount of illegal immigrants.
oh and here is some useful info
47% will not qualify to bring in a family member.
58% of people aged between 20 and 30 will not qualify to bring in a family member compared to 35-45% of people aged between 30 and 60.
61% of women and 32% of men will not qualify to bring in a family member. • 48% of people in Scotland will not qualify to bring in a family member.
51% of people in Wales will not qualify to bring in a family member.
46% of English residents will not qualify to bring in a family member.
29% of Londoners will not qualify to bring in a family member.
Pages
Add your comment