Advanced human rights law for immigration and asylum practitioners
One day 10am - 5pm
CPD: 6 hours
Level: Advanced/LSC level 2/OISC Level 3
Trainer: Navtej Singh Ahuluwalia
Dates:
6 July 10 10HR0607 London
20 Oct 10 10HR2010 London
This is an advanced course designed to coincide with
the requirements of accreditation at Senior Caseworker
- Level 2. It requires legal knowledge and experience of
the domestic immigration legal framework.
Course content
- human rights instruments – the effect of incorporation and the difference between domestic application of a) ECHR b) other international instruments
- the principles of interpretation which apply to the ECHR, intensity of scrutiny by the courts
- remedies under the HRA 1998 and domestic immigration/asylum legislation
- what is meant by ‘extra-territoriality’ – the scope of protection from (i) removal and (ii) exclusion permits
- Article 3 ECHR –
- absolute protection, Strasbourg principles
- domestic principles – medical treatment, mental illness, rape victims, prison conditions, absolute protection versus the ‘extension to an extension’ approach
- in-country breaches
- Article 8 ECHR –
- qualified protection, Strasbourg principles, domestic caselaw a) family life; b) private life
- scope of remaining Articles in removal/ exclusion context
- update on human rights case law in Europe and UK
- case studies.
-
Objectives
- At the end of the course participants should be able to:
- understand the scope of protection under the ECHR and which Articles can avail clients in context of removal and exclusion
- understand the difference between absolute and qualified rights and the scope of the court’s jurisdiction in respect of each
- understand principles and rules of interpretation derived from Strasbourg
- understand the way that human rights principles are applied in the UK in an immigration and asylum context
- be up to date with current case law
- be aware of the consequences of the grant of humanitarian protection or discretionary leave
- understand how to apply the principles to the facts in their clients’ cases
Accredited by the Bar Standards Board.