|
|
 |
Human Rights Law
Advanced human rights
law for immigration and asylum practitioners
One day 10am - 5pm
CPD: 5.5 hours
Level: Advanced/LSC level 2/OISC Level 3
Trainer: Navtej Singh Ahuluwalia
22 October 08 - 8HR2210 - London
21 January 09 - 9HR2101 - London
7 May 09 - 9HR0705 - London

This is an advanced course designed to coincide
with
the requirements of accreditation at Senior Caseworker
- Level 2. It requires legal knowledge and experience of
the domestic immigration legal framework.
Course content
- Human Rights instruments - the effect of
incorporation and the difference between domestic
application of a) ECHR b) other international
instruments
- the principles of interpretation which apply
to the
ECHR, intensity of scrutiny by the Courts
- remedies under the HRA 1998 and domestic
immigration/asylum legislation
- what is meant by 'extra-territoriality' -
the scope of
protection from (i) removal and (ii) exclusion permits
- Article 3 ECHR -
- absolute protection, Strasbourg principles
- domestic principles - medical treatment, mental
illness, rape victims, prison conditions, absolute
protection versus the 'extension to an extension'
approach
- in-country breaches
- Article 8 ECHR -
- qualified protection, Strasbourg principles,
domestic caselaw a) family life; b) private life
- scope of remaining Articles in removal/exclusion
context
- case studies
Objectives
At the end of the course participants should be able to:
- understand the scope of protection under the
ECHR
and which Articles can avail clients in context of
removal and exclusion
- understand the difference between absolute
and
qualified rights and the scope of the court's
jurisdiction in respect of each
- understand principles and rules of interpretation
derived from Strasbourg
- understand the way that human rights principles
are
applied in the UK in an immigration and asylum
context
- be up to date with current caselaw;
- be aware of the consequences of the grant
of
humanitarian protection or discretionary leave
- understand how to apply the principles to
the facts in
their clients' cases

|
 |
|